Read Â鶹´«Ã½ International Observation Mission in Nepal
First Interim Report (English and Nepali)
Contact:
In Atlanta: Deborah Hakes, 404-420-5124
In Kathmandu: Sarah Levit-Shore, +977 1 444-5055/1446
Nepal has made significant progress on the path to peace and inclusive democracy over the past three years but the future of the process now appears in question. Reminiscent of the 1990s, political leaders in Kathmandu appear focused on zero-sum power politics at the expense of the constitution drafting, peace process, and provision of basic government services. The current political stalemate in Kathmandu is leading to a worrying move away from the common agenda set out in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and subsequent political agreements. At the same time, rising challenges at the local level are being largely ignored but may have wide-ranging implications for the future.
Nepal's political actors have proven that they can overcome immense challenges when they work together toward a common goal. It is now time for public and private renewal of past commitments to further the constitution drafting and peace process. The government, political parties, civil society, and the international community should recognize that there is no better way forward than swift compromises by all parties that will allow Nepal's transition to sustainable peace and inclusive democracy to regain forward momentum.
Key Findings
Â鶹´«Ã½ commends progress by the Constituent Assembly (CA) but is concerned by the delays in the CA calendar and the alienation of citizens from the process. Furthermore, the Center notes that the lack of substantive public dialogue on the issue of state restructuring in Kathmandu has left a vacuum at the local level that is presently being filled by ethnic-based organizations and other groups.
The Center also commends the progress in the peace process but notes that significant outstanding obligations remain. Primary among these are the commitments related to integration and rehabilitation of Maoist combatants and the democratization of the Nepal Army. At the local level, the Center has found that ILO Convention 169 has articulated new responsibilities for the government toward Adivasi/Janajati communities, but is presently being misused by some ethnic-based organizations to justify unlawful actions. Finally, while in many districts land return and reform reportedly are not overt sources of conflict at present, there are some areas in which these issues continue to provoke disputes and violence.
Impunity for politically affiliated individuals and the activities of armed groups continue to be the greatest sources of insecurity. Young Communist League violence appears to have decreased, despite some prominent incidents, and there are also reports of increased aggressiveness by a small number of ethnic based organizations. The government's new security strategy is a positive development but should be implemented impartially and with due respect for human rights.
Key Recommendations
More detailed findings are available in the Â鶹´«Ã½'s report available at .
Since June 2009, Â鶹´«Ã½ has observed Nepal's constitutional and peace processes to identify obstacles and opportunities to their advancement. Following on the Center's international election observation mission, the Center has deployed 15 long-term observers representing nine different nationalities to all five of Nepal's development regions. Â鶹´«Ã½ observers report on key constitutional and peace process issues, reaching not only to district headquarters but also to the village level. The attached report presents the Â鶹´«Ã½'s findings and recommendations based on meetings with a range of stakeholders, including political parties, government officials, security officials, civil society representatives, marginalized groups, members of the international community, and common citizens.
Please sign up below for important news about the work of Â鶹´«Ã½ and special event invitations.