Â鶹´«Ã½

Share

Â鶹´«Ã½ Issues Statement on Nepal’s Counting Process

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: In Atlanta, Soyia Ellison, soyia.ellison@cartercenter.org

KATHMANDU — Â鶹´«Ã½ today issued a post-election statement detailing its findings related to Nepal’s vote-counting process.

These findings remain preliminary, pending the announcement of election results and the resolution of any disputes. A final report that includes recommendations to help strengthen the conduct of future elections in Nepal will be published in early 2018.

During the counting, Â鶹´«Ã½ observer teams were present in 27 districts throughout Nepal, including Phase 1 and Phase 2 districts. In its statement, Â鶹´«Ã½ noted that in the counting centers where observers had sufficient access, counting took place in a manner that was generally consistent with international standards, despite widespread deviations from established procedures. However, a considerable number of counting centers restricted Â鶹´«Ã½ observers’ access, limiting the transparency of the process.

The decision to hold the elections in two phases meant that ballot boxes from Phase 1 needed to be stored for 10 days before being opened, creating the risk of ballot-tampering. But in Phase 1 districts where Â鶹´«Ã½ observers were present, ballot boxes were safely secured and were under the close scrutiny of political party agents. Â鶹´«Ã½ observers reported no incidents related to the storage of Phase 1 ballot boxes.

After Phase 1 polling, the Election Commission of Nepal issued directives outlining official counting instructions. These were widely ignored, however, as most returning officers chose instead to work with political party agents to reach consensus on vote-counting procedures. In counting centers where Â鶹´«Ã½ observers were present, the deviations from the directives were intended to increase efficiency and avoid possible grievances and did not compromise the integrity of the count. While these local-level agreements ensured overall acceptance of the process and results, they also led to inconsistencies, particularly regarding the determination of the validity of ballots.

Party and candidate agents were consistently present in the counting centers and followed the process closely. Party agents did not make substantive complaints about the conduct of counting in the centers where Â鶹´«Ã½ observers were present.

Sixteen of the 27 districts in which Â鶹´«Ã½ observers were present provided full access to observers. The other 11 restricted access to varying degrees. Limiting observer access to this crucial aspect of the process is contrary to international standards, to the expressed intent of the ECN directives, and to the terms of observer accreditation. The presence of observers is integral to ensuring the transparency and integrity of an election, and provisions should always be in place to allow them adequate access.

Read the complete report >


Translation

In Nepali >

###

"Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope."
A not-for-profit, nongovernmental organization, Â鶹´«Ã½ has helped to improve life for people in over 80 countries by resolving conflicts; advancing democracy, human rights, and economic opportunity; preventing diseases; and improving mental health care. Â鶹´«Ã½ was founded in 1982 by former U.S. President Jimmy Carter and former First Lady Rosalynn Carter, in partnership with Emory University, to advance peace and health worldwide.